Use of technology in the communication of the laryngectomized person: good care practices

Authors

  • Ana Frade Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa
  • Susana Miguel Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa
  • Óscar Ferreira Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa

Keywords:

Total laryngectomy, impaired communication, nursing care, alternative and/or augmentative communication strategies, high-tech electronic devices

Abstract

Communication is one of the most important aspects of nursing care. Individuals submitted to total laryngectomy experience complex and frustrating communication problems, and should be informed prior to surgery on these changes, so that alternatives to verbal communication can be identified and combined, to be used after the surgical procedure. At post-operative period, persons
adopt gestures, writing, nodding and labial mimicry as alternative and/or augmentative communication strategies, which can be unsatisfactory and inconsistent. For optimize communication, other alternative and/or augmentative strategies of communication as well as consistent methods of communication should be explored. In this sense, the use of portable electronic devices (mobile phones, tablets, laptops) that have software installed for communication, easily accessible and easy to use, can optimize the communication of the voiceless person, including people undergoing total laryngectomy, for facilitate their adaptation, enhance their sense of independence and promote better care. Portable electronic devices are an important tool to improve communication, which offer several advantages and benefits (increased awareness and social acceptance of the use of alternative and/or augmentative communication strategies, empowerment, user’s ease in accessing communication solutions and high functionality). The aim of this article is to identify interventions to optimize communication, using portable electronic devices and to describe their use in order to improve the quality of nursing care, promoters of effective communication in the person submitted to total laryngectomy in the perioperative period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Noonan, B. & Hegarty, J. (2010). The Impact of Total Laryngectomy: The Patient’s Perspective. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(3), 293-301.

Haggood, A. (2000). Cancro da Cabeça e Pescoço. In Otto, S. (eds). Enfermagem em Oncologia (3ª ed.). Loures: Lusociência.

Happ, M., Roesch, T., & Kagan, S. (2004). Communication needs, methods, and perceived voice quality following head and neck surgery: A literature review. Cancer Nursing, 27(1), 1-9.

Fox, L. & Rau, M. (2001). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults following glossectomy and laryngectomy surgery. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(3), 161-166.

Magrin, J. & Kowalski, L. (2003). Complicações das cirurgias por câncer de boca e de orofaringe. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, 31(2), 45-48.

Baehring, E. & McCorkle, R. (2012). Postoperative Complications in Head and Neck Cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16(6), E203 - E209.

Rodriguez, C. & Blischark, D. (2010). Communication needs of nonspeaking hospitalized postoperative patients with head and neck cancer. Applied Nursing Research, 23(2), 110-115.

Silva, L., Pinto, M. & Zago, M. (2002). Assistência do Enfermeiro ao Laringectomizado no período pós-operatório. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 48(2), 213-221.

Campana, I. & Goiato, M. (2013). Tumores de Cabeça e Pescoço: Epidemiologia, Fatores de Risco, Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Revista Odontológica de Araçatuba, 34(1), 20-26.

RORENO (2016). Registo Oncológico Nacional 2010. Porto: Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil – EPE.

WHO (2012). Globocan 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Acedido a: 25-05-2016. Disponível em http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.

Bickford, J., Coveney, J., Baker, J. & Hersh, D. (2013). Living with the altered self: A qualitative study of life after total laryngectomy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(3), 324-333.

Olias, J. (2004). Cirurgia da Laringe: Atlas de técnicas cirúrgicas e Guia de dissecção. Massamá: Círculo Médico.

Morente, J. & Torres, J. (2004). Manual del laringectomizado. Málaga: Ediciones.

Favretto, D., Carvalho, E., Canini, S. & Garbin, L. (2007) Comunicação verbal prejudicada: atividades empregadas vs. atividades propostas na literatura. Revista Mineira de Enfermagem, 2(3), 227-232.

Pinheiro, P. & Gomes, M. (2013). As TIC na Comunicação Alternativa e Aumentativa. In Atas do XII Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia (pp. 5954-5962). Braga: Universidade do Minho – Centro de Investigação em Educação.

Rodriguez, C. & Rowe, M. (2010). Use of a speech-generating device for hospitalized postoperative patients with head and neck cancer experiencing speechlessness. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37(2), 199-205.

EONS (2013). Cancer Nursing Curriculum 2014 (4th ed.). Brussels: EONS.

Oliveira, V. (2009). Transições de Vida em Adultos submetidos a Laringectomia Total – Implicações na Educação para a Saúde. Dissertação de Mestrado de Educação – Especialização em Educação para a Saúde. Minho: Instituto de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade do Minho.

Freixo, A. (2013). A importância da comunicação aumentativa/alternativa em alunos com paralisia cerebral no 1º ciclo do ensino básico. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências da Educação na Especialidade em Educação Especial: domínio cognitivo e motor. Lisboa: Escola Superior de Educação João de Deus.

Doenges, M., Moorhouse, M. & Murr, A. (2010). Nursing Care Plans - Guidlines for Individualizing Client Care Across the life Span. Philadelphia: David Company.

Coelho, Y., Bissoli, A., Sime, M. & Bastos-Filho, T. (2015). CAApp: Um Aplicativo Móvel de Comunicação Aumentativa e Alternativa para Pessoas com Deficiência Motora Severa. In: XV Workshop de Informática Médica - XXXV Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2015. Recife: Anais.

Panhan, H. (2010). Comunicação Suplementar e Alternativa nos Distúrbios Neurológicos Adquiridos. In Ortiz, K. et al. (eds). Distúrbios Neurológicos adquiridos: fala e deglutição (pp. 243-277). (2ª ed). São Paulo: Manole.

Happ, M., Roesch, T. & Kagan, S. (2005). Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: a pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices. Oncology Nursing Forum, 32(6), 1179-1187.

Matos, R. E., Soares, E., Castro, M. E., Fialho, A. V. M. & Caetano, J. A. (2009). Dificuldades de comunicação verbal do cliente laringectomizado. Rev. enferm. UERJ, 17(2), 176-181.

McNaughton, D. & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and Mobile Technology Revolution: Benefits and Challenges for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(2), 107-116.

Sharpe, B. & Hemsley, B. (2016). Improving nurse-patient communication with patients with communication impairments: hospital nurses’ views on the feasibility of using mobile communication technologies. Applied Nursing Research, 30, 228-236.

Published

2017-12-11

How to Cite

1.
Frade A, Miguel S, Ferreira Óscar. Use of technology in the communication of the laryngectomized person: good care practices. Onco.News [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 11 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];(35):18-23. Available from: https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/84

Issue

Section

Review Articles