Safety in the Administration of Systemic Antineoplastic Therapy in Hematology-Oncology: Unequivocal Identification and Independent Double Verification

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2026.52.05

Keywords:

antineoplastic agents, hemato-oncology, independent double check, patient safety, quality of health care

Abstract

Introduction: Hospitals are complex environments with a high potential for errors. Systemic antineoplastic therapy, due to its risk and complexity, requires rigorous safety measures to ensure safe administration.

Objective: To assess the impact of a structured continuous improvement program (PDSA) on nurses’ adherence to patient positive identification and independent double-checking practices in the Hemato-Oncology Day Hospital.

Methods: Quantitative, descriptive, and observational study applying the PDSA improvement cycle. Semi-annual internal audits were conducted between 2022 and 2024, totaling 951 observations before and after the implementation of improvement strategies.

Results: Adherence to patient positive identification remained high (>98%). In parallel, adherence to independent double-checking of therapy increased significantly from 78.1% to 85.2% (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion: The systematic implementation of these practices contributes to risk mitigation and patient safety in the administration of systemic antineoplastic therapy. Continuation of the implemented strategies and the adoption of advanced technologies are recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Almeida M. Identificação inequívoca do doente em contexto hospitalar [dissertação]. Lisboa: Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa; 2016.

2. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Plano de ação global para a segurança do doente 2021–2030: rumo à eliminação dos danos evitáveis nos cuidados de saúde. Genebra: OMS; 2021.

3. World Health Organization. Medication without harm: global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

4. Direção-Geral da Saúde. Plano Nacional para a Segurança dos Doentes 2021–2026. Lisboa: DGS; 2021.

5. Sangoi K, Borchartt D, Rodrigues F. O processo de administração de quimioterapia e a sua relação com a segurança do paciente oncológico. Braz J Dev. 2021;7(8):79071–82.

6. Joint Commission International. International patient safety goals. 6th ed. Oak Brook Terrace: JCI; 2021.

7. Vieira J, Diniz A, Santos A. Segurança na preparação e administração de medicamentos: implementação de um projeto de segurança do doente. Servir. 2024;2(11):2–6.e38438.

8. Coelho F, Furtado L, Mendonça N, Soares H, Duarte H, Costeira C, et al. Fatores predisponentes a erros de medicação por enfermeiros e estratégias de prevenção: uma revisão de escopo da literatura recente. Nurs Rep. 2024;14:1553–69.

9. Gordo C, Núñez-Córdoba J, Mateo R. Root causes of adverse drug events in hospitals and artificial intelligence capabilities for prevention. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(7):3168–75.

10. Albeah A. Evaluating the knowledge, attitude, and practice of oncology nurses towards the safe handling of antineoplastic drugs. Int J Res Med Sci. 2025.

11. Sousa CBC, Silva CEAL, Xerez NRA, Moreira JC, Leite PAR, Silva DCP, et al. Safe practices in the administration of antineoplastics in pediatric oncology. Braz J Dev. 2020;6(11):89744–62.

12. Knudsen S, Laursen H, Johnsen S, Bartels P, Ehlers L, Mainz J. Can quality improvement improve the quality of care? A systematic review of reported effects and methodological rigor in plan-do-study-act projects. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:683.

13. Direção-Geral da Saúde. Norma nº018/2011 Mecanismos e Procedimentos de Identificação Inequívoca dos Doentes em Instituições de Saúde. Lisboa: DGS;2011.

14. Schutijser B, Klopotowska JE, Jongerden I, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C, de Bruijne MC. Nurse compliance with a protocol for safe injectable medication administration: comparison of two multicentre observational studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019648.

15. Vória J, Padula B, Abreu M, Corrêa A, Rocha P, Manzo B. Compliance to safety barriers in the medication administration process in pediatrics. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2020;29:e20190231.

16. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Targeted medication safety best practices for hospitals 2020–2021. Horsham (PA): ISMP; 2020.

17. Joint Commission International. Patient safety goals: identification of the patient. Oak Brook Terrace: JCI; 2023.

18. Koyama AK, Thompson KA, Backman C, et al. Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(7):595–604.

19. Westbrook JI, Li L, Raban MZ, et al. Associations between double-checking and medication administration errors: a direct observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30(4):320–30.

20. Carteiro D, Ramos M, Pereira S, Lucas I, Sales L. Um olhar sobre a segurança do doente nos cuidados de saúde primários: revisão da literatura. Revista de Ciências da Saúde da ESSCVP. 2023;15:1-15.

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

1.
Gaspar C, Rosa AFVJ, Pinheiro AMR. Safety in the Administration of Systemic Antineoplastic Therapy in Hematology-Oncology: Unequivocal Identification and Independent Double Verification. Onco.News [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 29 [cited 2026 Apr. 29];(52):e0318. Available from: https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/318

Issue

Section

Clinical & Investigation Good Practices

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.