Infusion Pump Flow Rates In Central Venous Catheters: Thrombus Reflux And Aspiration Clot

Authors

  • Jose Manuel Martinez Clinical Nurse Specialist, Infection Control Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Porto
  • Rita Capela Clinical Nurse Specialist, HematologyOncology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto

Keywords:

Infusion pump, Aggressive flushing, Aspiration clot, Occlusion

Abstract

Aggressive infusion pump flow rates can lead to central venous catheter (CVC) occlusion resulting from thrombus reflux into the CVC lumen.    Methods: A single-center prospective comparative study was performed, including all consecutive cases of occlusion events in hematology oncology patients using a CVC (Hickman® nº7) since August 2018 to September 2019 (Phase 1), and October 2019 to September 2020 (Phase 2) at the Onco-Hematology Department of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology (Porto). Two phases were described: Phase 1: Observational period using a platinum-based regime (DHAP) undergoing continuous infusion pump rate ≥ 200 mL/hr. Phase 2: Intervention period using a platinum-based regime (DHAP) undergoing continuous infusion pump rate ≤ 200 mL/hr.   Results: Overall, 39 DHAP regimens were reported with a total number of 43 occlusions identified in the study period (phase 1, n=28 vs phase 2, n=15). Occlusion risk associated with the infusion pump rates between phases was higher in phase 1 (phase 1, n=11 vs phase 2, n=3, RR 3.313 [1.010 to 13.863], ≤0.05). When aspiration clot (n=5) was identified, CVC always was removed. No aspiration clot was observed in phase 2.    Conclusion: Aggressive infusion pump flow rates can increase occlusion risk resulting from thrombus reflux into the CVC lumen and aspiration clot.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zakhour, R., Chaftari, A. M., & Raad, I. I. (2016). Catheter-related infections in patients with haematological malignancies: novel preventive and therapeutic strategies. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 16(11), e241-e250.

Joint Commission, Joint Commission Resources, Inc, & Joint Commission International. (2012). Preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections: a global challenge, a global perspective. Joint Commission Resources.

Baskin JL, Pui CH, Reiss U, Wilimas JA, Metzger ML, Ribeiro RC, et al, (2009). Management of occlusion and thrombosis associated with long-term indwelling central venous catheters. The Lancet, 374(9684), 159-169.

Callister D, Limchaiyawat P, Eells SJ, Miller LG. (2015). Risk Factors for Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Era of Prevention Bundles. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 36(2), 214-216.

Cesaro, S., Corrò, R., Pelosin, A., Gamba, P., Zadra, N., Fusaro, F., ... & Cavaliere, M. (2004). A prospective survey on incidence and outcome of Broviac/Hickman catheter-related complications in pediatric patients affected by hematological and oncological diseases. Annals of Hematology, 83(3), 183-188.

Smith, S. N., Moureau, N., Vaughn, V. M., Boldenow, T., Kaatz, S., Grant, P. J., ... & Chopra, V. (2017). Patterns and predictors of peripherally inserted central catheter occlusion: the 3P-O study. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 28(5), 749-756.

Napalkov, P., Felici, D. M., Chu, L. K., Jacobs, J. R., & Begelman, S. M. (2013). Incidence of catheter-related complications in patients with central venous or hemodialysis catheters: a health care claims database analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 13(1), 86.

Kitchens, C. S., Konkle, B. A., & Kessler, C. M. (2013). Consultative Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Expert Consult-Online and Print. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Moore, R. A., Adel, N., Riedel, E., Bhutani, M., Feldman, D. R., Tabbara, N. E., ... & Hassoun, H. (2011). High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(25), 3466.

Gunawansa, N., Sudusinghe, D. H., & Wijayaratne, D. R. (2018). Hemodialysis catheter-related central venous thrombosis: clinical approach to evaluation and management. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 51, 298-305.

Beard, J. D., Gaines, P. A., & Loftus, I. (Eds.). (2013). Vascular and Endovascular Surgery E-Book: Companion to Specialist Surgical Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Hadaway, L. C. (2005). Reopen the pipeline for IV therapy. Nursing 2005, 35(8), 54-61.

Chopra, V., Flanders, S. A., Saint, S., Woller, S. C., O’Grady, N. P., Safdar, N., ... & Pittiruti, M. (2015). The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA

appropriateness method. Annals of Internal Medicine, 163(6_Supplement), S1-S40.

Lim, M. Y., Al-Kali, A., Ashrani, A. A., Begna, K. H., Elliott, M. A., Hogan, W. J., ...& Patnaik, M. S. (2013). Comparison of complication rates of Hickman® catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy. Leukemia& Lymphoma, 54(6), 1263-1267.

Cummings-Winfield, C., & Mushani, T. (2008). Restoring patency to central venous access devices. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 12(6), 925.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

1.
Martinez JM, Capela R. Infusion Pump Flow Rates In Central Venous Catheters: Thrombus Reflux And Aspiration Clot. Onco.News [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 7 [cited 2025 Jan. 22];(42):16-20. Available from: https://onco.news/index.php/journal/article/view/16