Benefícios do envolvimento dos doentes e do público na investigação do cancro: revisão da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31877/on.2025.51.05Palavras-chave:
cancro, Revisão narrativa, Envolvimento dos doentes e do público, InvestigaçãoResumo
Atualmente a investigação no cancro permite diagnósticos mais precoces e tratamentos mais eficazes. A complexidade e impacto socioeconómico da doença exigem abordagens inovadoras como a participação dos doentes e do público na investigação.
O objetivo desta revisão é identificar os benefícios do envolvimento dos doentes e do público na investigação do cancro.
Foi utilizada a escala para revisões não sistemáticas, Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA).
Destacam-se benefícios individuais, no contínuo da investigação, éticos e sociais, decorrentes desta abordagem holística que atende às expectativas e exigências das pessoas e dos envolvidos na prestação de cuidados de saúde à pessoa com doença oncológica. Garantir que as necessidades, perspetivas e preocupações destas pessoas sejam consideradas permite resultados promotores de transparência e confiança para a comunidade científica e na prática clínica.
Em suma, o envolvimento dos doentes e público na investigação do cancro contribui para melhorar a qualidade da investigação.
Downloads
Referências
1. Bray F, Laversanne | Mathieu, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2024 Apr 4 [cited 2024 Apr 15];1–35. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21834
2. Despacho n.o 13227/2023 do Gabinete da Secretária de Estado da Promoção da Saúde: Estratégia Nacional de Luta contra o Cancro, Horizonte 2030 [Internet]. Diário da República n.o 248/2023, Série II de 2023-12-27 2023. Available from: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/despacho/13227-2023-835712442
3. UNESCO. UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 14]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/about
4. Rius C, Liu Y, Sixto-Costoya A, Valderrama-Zurián JC, Lucas-Dominguez R. State of open science in cancer research. Clinical and Translational Oncology. 2024;
5. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expect. 2012;17(5):637–50.
6. Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J. ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation– the RAPPORT study. In: ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation– the RAPPORT study. 3rd ed. Health Serv Deliv Res ; 2015.
7. Collins K, Boote J, Ardron D, Gath J, Green T, Ahmedzai SH. Making patient and public involvement in cancer and palliative research a reality: Academic support is vital for success. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;5(2):203–6.
8. Sharpless NE, Singer DS. Progress and potential: The Cancer Moonshot. Cancer Cell. 2021 Jul 12;39(7):889–94.
9. Roquette C, Crisóstomo S, Milagre T, Ribeiro RS, Pedro AR, Valente A. Patient organisations’ views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal. BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1).
10. Stjernswärd S, Glasdam S. The European Standard EN 17398:2020 on Patient Involvement in Health Care – a Fairclough-Inspired Critical Discourse Analysis. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2022 May 1;23(2):130–41.
11. Lorenzo F de, Apostolidis K. The European Cancer Patient Coalition and its central role in connecting stakeholders to advance patient-centric solutions in the mission on cancer. Mol Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;13(3):653–66.
12. Pii KH, Schou LH, Piil K, Jarden M. Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review. Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):3-20.
13. Bergin RJ, Short CE, Davis N, Marker J, Dawson MT, Milton S, et al. The nature and impact of patient and public involvement in cancer prevention, screening and early detection research: A systematic review. Prev Med (Baltim). 2023 Feb 1;167:107412.
14. Geissler J, Ryll B, di Priolo SL, Uhlenhopp M. Improving Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development: A Practical Roadmap. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Sep 1;51(5):612–9.
15. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Dec;4(1).
16. Sukhera J. Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical. J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Aug 1;14(4):414–7.
17. Nazareth C, Kalil M, Kalil M. Revisão de literatura e revisão sistemática: uma análise objetiva. International Journal of Science Dentistry [Internet]. 2021;Janeiro/Julho(55):39–47. Available from: http://www.periodicos.uff.br/index
18. Gordon L, Dickinson A, Offredy M, Smiddy J. A research note on the benefit of patient and public involvement in research: The experience of prostate cancer patients regarding information in radiotherapy. Radiography. 2017 May 1;23(2):167–70.
19. Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper C, Armitage CJ, Barber R. Credibility and the “professionalized” lay expert: reflections on the dilemmas and opportunities of public involvement in health research. Health (London). 2012 Nov;16(6):602–18.
20. Mosconi P, Colombo C, Paletta P, Gangeri L, Pellegrini C, Garralda E, et al. Public and patient involvement: a survey on knowledge, experience and opinions among researchers within a precision oncology European project. BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 1;23(840):1–10.
21. Colomer-Lahiguera S, Corbière T, Reeb-Landry F, Ninane F, Addeo A, Eicher M. [Patient involvement in oncology research - Development of a reference framework in French-speaking Switzerland]. Rev Med Suisse. 2022 Mar;18(775):621–5.
22. Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253.
23. Wilkinson C, Gibson A, Biddle M, Hobbs L. Public involvement and public engagement: An example of convergent evolution? Findings from a conceptual qualitative review of patient and public involvement, and public engagement, in health and scientific research. PEC Innov. 2024 Apr 7;4:100281.
24. Ellis U, Kitchin V, Vis-Dunbar M. Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review. J Particip Med. 2021 Jun 10;13(2):e27141.
25. INVOLVE. Impact of public involvement on the ethical aspects of research [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Jul 1]. Available from: www.invo.org.uk/posttypepublication/public-involvement-in-researchimpact-on-ethical-aspects-of-research
26. Pattison N, Lee M. Two tribes coming together: Patient and public involvement in cancer research. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):1–2.
27. Arumugam A, Phillips LR, Moore A, Kumaran SD, Sampath KK, Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Ranganadhababu BN, Hegazy F, Botto-van Bemden A. Patient and public involvement in research: a review of practical resources for young investigators. BMC Rheumatol. 2023 Mar 9;7(1):2.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Cátia Teixeira, Sílvia Reis
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
